Transportation

The centerpiece of the America 2050 vision for infrastructure is a new, national transportation program that sets out a framework for federal investment while promoting increased flexibility and demanding greater accountability of states and local governments to meet federal objectives.This transportation program must effectively respond to national and global trends such as rising goods movement, changing demographics, and global climate change. It should prioritize investments in locations that are best equipped to provide capacity for low-carbon population and economic growth - the nation's metropolitan areas and megaregions. Importantly, the nation's transportation policy must be driven by a strongly stated purpose and clear objectives that determine how funding is spent. States and local governments should be held accountable to performance measures that underpin federal objectives.

A set of objectives for the nation's transportation policy should include:

  1. Create capacity for long-term, sustainable growth;
  2. Enhance global, national, and regional accessibility;
  3. Provide transportation choice, integration of transportation modes, and "complete streets";
  4. Improve safety, security and national defense;
  5. Reduce our dependence on foreign oil and respond to global climate change;
  6. Achieve greater system performance and reliability;
  7. Serve elderly, people with disabilities, and disadvantaged populations;

We propose a new national system, dubbed the "Trans-American Network," which includes three new initiatives, all driven by a stronger role by the federal government to meet a narrower set of clearly defined goals for transportation.

  1. The Competitive Corridors and Gateways Initiative: The centerpiece of the federal program is a new, highly-visible national investment program to build added capacity in seaports, airports, rail (both passenger and freight), and highway freight corridors. A research-driven multimodal national study could determine pressing national needs to facilitate global trade, intercity passenger movement, and metropolitan and megaregion accessibility. The study would result in a map of national investments, as specific as the Interstate Highway System when it was first proposed. Federal block grants or financing packages issued by a national infrastructure bank could help finance the components of the system, administered to suitable alliances of state transportation departments, high-speed rail authorities, metropolitan transit agencies, and public private partnerships.
  2. The Asset Protection and Performance Initiative:  The current federal transportation program would be reoriented toward the goal of maintaining current highway and public transportation assets drawing on the transportation trust fund, with greater restrictions on federal funding to be used toward maintaining existing roads, bridges and transit systems. Federal incentives would be offered for states and regions to experiment with programs that enhance system performance, such as congestion pricing, greater use of ITS, and innovations that increase ridership, safety, and communications technology on transit systems. Existing programs that mitigate air pollution from congestion, such as the CMAQ, would be preserved under this initiative, but the attributable funding for each metropolitan region should be sub-allocated directed to regional authorities. 
  3. Metropolitan Mobility Starts:  This initiative would target new capacity needs in metropolitan regions, tying federal funding more directly to meeting national objectives, but with greater flexibility about how those objectives are met. This would mark a shift away from modal-specific funding categories at the national level and toward mode-neutral project selection based on meeting national objectives. The British government has recently adopted such an approach, spurred by the influential Eddington report, which demonstrated the connection between transportation and the national economy. New projects in the United Kingdom are now evaluated on their ability to meet national economic objectives and other criteria, including cost benefit analysis.
For more information of America 2050's transportation program, contact:

Petra Todorovich: petra@rpa.org

Recent Entries

December 15 - U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters and Congressman John Mica (R-FL) joined Mayor Michael Bloomberg in New York City today to announce the Department of Transportation's request for proposals for high-speed rail investment in corridors across the United States. Citing the energy efficiency, convenience, and economic competitiveness benefits of high-speed rail, the political leaders lamented the slow progress of the U.S. in implementing modern high-speed rail technology.

The new high-speed rail initiative announced today by the U.S. DOT is a small program in  the recently enacted Rail Safety Act, signed into law by President Bush in October 2008. Much more significant is the authorization of approximately $13 billion for Amtrak and U.S. states for operating and capital costs related to intercity and high-speed rail. The focus of today's press conference, the issuance of a request for proposals for private investment in high-speed rail should result in an interesting preview of whether private investors consider rail a profit-making enterprise. At best, it should garner some new energy, ideas, and proposals for how to make this long overdue technology available in the U.S. At worst, it could distract from the urgent task at hand --bringing America's existing rail network up to a state of good repair and implementing dependable, regular, and more frequent intercity services in corridors around the U.S. 

New York Channel 4 reported on the new conference below.

America 2050 Calls on New Administration to Invest Wisely

A coalition of leading civic, business, environmental organizations and transportation officials convened by America 2050 released a statement today calling on the incoming Obama administration and the U.S. Congress to invest wisely in the proposed economic stimulus plan focused on infrastructure.

Responding to President-elect Obama's video address on December 6 announcing the "largest investment in infrastructure since the National Highway System," the group urged the President-elect to get this investment right with a five-step program: Fix, Phase, Green, Train and Count.

America 2050 Infrastructure Recommendations: Stimulus-Economic Recovery-Renewal

I.    FIX: To immediately create jobs and stimulate economic growth we need to "fix it first," that is, invest in the repair and maintenance of the country's deteriorated bridges, roads, public transit, passenger & freight rail, electric grids and other essential infrastructure components that have been neglected for decades. 

II.    PHASE: All the monies cannot be spent at once. While we must get a first group of "shovel ready" projects under construction as soon as possible, there are limits to the number of projects that can be initiated immediately. A series of phases should allow for the development of strategic projects, job training, and the building of capacity in construction, manufacturing, engineering and project management fields - all of which are essential to successfully carrying out the work.

III.    GREEN: Priority should be given to projects that foster energy independence, safeguard the environment, promote healthy & compact communities, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

IV.    TRAIN: Investment in America's infrastructure will create hundreds of thousands of skilled jobs, both immediately and for decades to come. To ensure that these large-scale projects are completed quickly and successfully, we need to invest in job training programs that will provide our workforce with the required skills. And, equally important, the jobs should be accessible to the people in the communities most deeply affected by the current economic crisis.

V.    COUNT: Funding must be set aside to measure and analyze the results of these federal investments and their outcomes: job creation, cost-effectiveness, greenhouse gas reductions, increased energy efficiency, etc.

ACCOUNTABILITY - NEW OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

If America is to remain economically competitive, we cannot afford "business as usual" when it comes to infrastructure investments. Therefore, a new federal oversight committee is required to both streamline the investment process and also establish accountability.

We propose creating a National Recovery and Renewal Council, comprised of representatives from federal, state, and city agencies, as well as the private sector. The Council would report directly to the White House, charged with eliminating the red tape in implementing projects, as well as developing criteria and accountability measures that will guarantee that America meets its infrastructure goals, from energy independence to reduced carbon emissions to increased mobility.

Download the Statement here.

"Build for America" Campaign Launch

T4A Presser 10.15.08 PSW 008.jpg October 15: On the eve of the final presidential debate, civic leaders gathered with government officials in multiple cities across the country to launch the "Build for America" campaign, making the link between strengthening America's economy and building a 21st century transportation system. In New York, America 2050 joined with Transportation For America, Regional Plan Association, The NYPIRG Straphangers Campaign, Transportation Alternatives, and the New York General Contractors Association at Grand Central Terminal to call on the Presidential candidates and the next Congress to boost America's economy by building 21st Century transportation in America.

Speakers at the New York City event included DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan, MTA chief executive Lee Sander, and U.S. representatives Jerrold Nadler and Carolyn Maloney.  These leaders focused on the potential positive economic impact of federal spending on infrastructure in the face of a private sector slowdown.  They stressed that in contrast to short term stimulus packages, these transportation investments would provide both short term and long term benefits: boosting the economy in the short term by providing jobs, and ensuring long term competitiveness as a country by providing capacity for efficient and sustainable economic growth. View press coverage of this event here.

Northeast Business Leaders Urge Action on Amtrak Bill




September 10 - Members of the Business Alliance for Northeast Mobility met in Washington with Senators Tom Carper (DE), Frank Lautenberg (NJ), John Kerry (MA), Bob Casey, Jr. (PA), Rep. Rob Andrews (NJ) and Amtrak President Alex Kummant.

The Business leaders and lawmakers convened in Washington D.C.'s Union Station to show their support for the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act, which passed both houses of Congress in the last year with veto-proof majorities. This bill will authorize increased funding over five years for Amtrak and the states for passenger rail capital and operating expenses.

This week marks the start of a three-week legislative session before Congress adjourns for the election season. If the Passenger Rail bill does not pass this year, the process must begin again next year with new bills in each House. Members of the Business Alliance, including representatives of the CEO Council for Growth of Philadelphia, the Greater Baltimore Committee, Regional Plan Association of New York, the New England Council and others stressed the importance of passing the bill this year. The time to act is now!

Photos: Sen. Tom Carper, center (above); Below top: From left: Kevin Corbett, Alex Kummant, Sen. Tom Carper, Sen. John Kerry, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, speaking, Lyle Wray, Otis Rolley. Below: Gov. Mark Schweiker, speaking.





Conference: Greening the Iron Ribbon - Sep 16 at NYU

Greening Iron Ribbon.jpg
With a current population of 50 million, the Northeast Megaregion is expected to welcome another 18 million residents by the year 2050.

In light of this trend, the Greening of the Iron Ribbon conference will discuss and identify new paradigms for development and sustainability that will redefine our region for years to come.

The keynote address will be given by Eugenie Birch, FAICP, Co-Director of the Penn Institute for Urban Research, and Lawrence C. Nussdorf Professor of Urban Research.

Register Online Here.


Sponsors:
AIA New York Chapter
NYU Wagner Rudin Center for Transportation Policy & Management
Regional Plan Association (RPA)
APA New York Metro Chapter
ULI New York District Council
Boston Society of Architects
AIA Philadelphia
AIA Washington DC
NYU-Wagner Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems

COST:           
$50 for Members of Sponsoring Organizations
$75 for Non-Members

Amtrak Continues to See Record Levels of Ridership

For almost a year now, Americans have felt the burden of surging gas prices and have shifted to intercity rail.  According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, ridership on Amtrak increased 14 percent last month from last July.  The Capitol Corridor, which serves the San Francisco and Sacramento market, has seen ridership increase by 33 percent.  Overall gains across the nation on Amtrak's routes seem to support its projected total ridership of 28 million for the current fiscal year.  It is clear that some of the nation's busiest highways, airways and rail corridors have reached or are near capacity.  Leaders in Washington have responded to these trends as evidenced by passing legislation in both the House and Senate to reauthorize Amtrak.  The increased funding could help Amtrak fix existing infrastructure deficiencies, such as dilapidated catenaries, and aging bridges and tunnels, as well as finance a long awaited capital program to expand services. 

Read the full WSJ article.

EarlBluemauer_1.jpgJuly 15: Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) introduced a bill recently that addresses rising energy and transportation costs, and offers potential solutions to relieve the pressure off of the American public.  Titled, "H.R. 6495: Transportation and Housing Choices for Gas Price Relief Act of 2008", the proposed bipartisan legislation was referred to the House Oversight and Government Reform, Ways and Means, Financial Services and Transportation and Infrastructure Committees.  By offering housing and transportation choices, Blumenauer and co-sponsors Reps. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) and Christopher Shays (R-CT) aim to relieve the added burden of energy costs and gas prices that have tripled over the last decade. 

Specifically, the bill provides the following alternatives: 1) Increasing commuter choices by making public transit more accessible, encouraging transit-oriented development, and incentivizing car and van-pooling, bicycling and using public transit; 2) Helping transit agencies by providing fare subsidies, and funds for service improvements; 3) Assisting communities by increasing funding for Safe Routes to School programs which encourage walking and biking to and from schools and expand program to high schools; 4) Providing housing assistance to homeowners who chose to live near public transit, and provide increased funding for states to build more affordable housing near transit; and 5) Increasing federal role in local transportation management that encourages more efficient use of transportation assets, and increasing transportation fringe benefits to all federal employees.  

Click here to read the text of H.R. 6495

 

Final Utility Chart.jpg

The notion of an efficiency gap in the current transportation networks is explored in a Master's thesis by Columbia University graduate student and America 2050 research intern, Yoav Hagler.  At short distances, the most efficient mode of intra-megaregion travel is auto, and at long distances, the most efficient mode is air.  However there exists an intermediate distance at which the most efficient mode based on these four criteria is high-speed rail.  The efficiency gap, which peaks between 200-400 miles can aid future studies in regards to preferred route selection, station, location, and the location of megaregional transportation hubs.

The Master's thesis titled "Back on Track: An Examination of Current Transportation Networks and Potential High-Speed Rail Systems in Three U.S. Megaregions is available for download here.  The study analyzed the current transportation networks and proposed high-speed rail networks in the Northeast, Midwest, and the Florida megaregions.  This research analyzed, from the consumer prospective the total reach, cost, reliability, and convenience of four modes (Air, Auto, Rail and High-Speed Rail) for travel within these megaregions.